Performance Evaluation of Rice Husk Ash as a Sustainable Supplementary Cementitious Material in Pavement Concrete

Authors

  • Md. Zakir Hossain Khan Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering and Technology, Natore-6431, Bangladesh Author
  • Md Mohaiminul Alam Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering and Technology, Natore-6431, Bangladesh Author
  • Md Mahamudul Hasan Tayef Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering and Technology, Natore-6431, Bangladesh Author
  • Saif Muhammad Nasrun Nabi Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering and Technology, Natore-6431, Bangladesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59675/E413

Keywords:

Rice husk ash (RHA), supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), green pavement, compressive strength, pozzolanic reaction, sustainable construction

Abstract

This study examines the feasibility of utilizing rice husk ash (RHA) as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in concrete for pavement applications. Unlike many prior investigations that rely on thermally processed RHA, this work employs locally sourced RHA without additional treatment, thereby reflecting a more practical and resource-efficient approach. A series of laboratory evaluations, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and compressive strength testing, were conducted to characterize the chemical composition, microstructure, and mechanical performance of RHA-modified concrete. The RHA was found to be rich in amorphous silica, indicative of substantial pozzolanic activity. Concrete incorporating 5% RHA as a partial cement replacement exhibited the highest compressive strength, outperforming the control mix. In contrast, higher replacement levels (10–20%) led to decreased strength due to the dilution of cementitious phases and the presence of unreacted RHA. Microstructural observations confirmed that RHA contributes to matrix refinement by reacting with calcium hydroxide to form additional calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) gel. Overall, the findings demonstrate that low-level RHA incorporation can enhance mechanical performance while simultaneously promoting sustainability through agricultural waste utilization and reduced CO₂ emissions associated with cement production.

References

1. Kovler K, Roussel N. Properties of fresh and hardened concrete. Cement Concrete Res. 2011;41(7):775-792.

2. Khalaf MA, Ban CC, Ramli M. The constituents, properties and application of heavyweight concrete: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2019; 215:73-89.

3. Li Z, Zhou X, Ma H, Hou D. Advanced concrete technology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2022.

4. Manu BA. Innovative construction materials: Advancing sustainability, durability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in modern infrastructure. Int J Res Publ Rev. 2024;5(12):4987-4999.

5. Nawy EG. Fundamentals of high-performance concrete. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.

6. Andrew RM. Global CO 2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data. 2018 Jan 26;10(1):195-217.

7. Andrew RM. Global CO 2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth System Science Data. 2019 Nov 20;11(4):1675-710.

8. Worrell E, Price L, Martin N, Hendriks C, Meida LO. Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annu Rev Energy Environ. 2001;26(1):303-329.

9. Soomro M, Tam VWY, Evangelista ACJ. Production of cement and its environmental impact. In: Recycled Concrete. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2023. p.11-46.

10. Van Oss HG, Padovani AC. Cement manufacture and the environment Part II: Environmental challenges and opportunities. J Ind Ecol. 2003;7(1):93-126.

11. Mohamad N, Muthusamy K, Embong R, Kusbiantoro A, Hashim MH. Environmental impact of cement production and solutions: A review. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 48:741-746.

12. Sharma K, Jain U, Singhal A. Treatment of waste generated from cement industry and their treatment-a review. Recuperado de http://dl. lib. mrt. ac. lk/handle/123/8889. 2013.

13. Jahan S, Singh A. Causes and impact of industrial effluents on receiving water bodies: A review. Malays J Sci Adv Technol. 2023;3(2):111–121.

14. Moraes CA, Fernandes IJ, Calheiro D, Kieling AG, Brehm FA, Rigon MR, et al. Review of the rice production cycle: By-products and the main applications focusing on rice husk combustion and ash recycling. Waste Manag Res. 2014;32(11):1034-1048.

15. Fernandes IJ, Calheiro D, Kieling AG, Moraes CA, Rocha TL, Brehm FA, et al. Characterization of rice husk ash produced using different biomass combustion techniques for energy. Fuel. 2016; 165:351-359.

16. Siddique R. Rice husk ash. In: Waste materials and by-products in concrete. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p.235-264.

17. Amran M, Fediuk R, Murali G, Vatin N, Karelina M, Ozbakkaloglu T, et al. Rice husk ash-based concrete composites: A critical review of their properties and applications. Crystals. 2021;11(2):168.

18. Mosaberpanah MA, Umar SA. Utilizing rice husk ash as supplement to cementitious materials on performance of ultra-high-performance concrete: A review. Mater Today Sustain. 2020; 7:100030.

19. Farooque KN, Zaman M, Halim E, Islam S, Hossain M, Mollah YA, et al. Characterization and utilization of rice husk ash (RHA) from rice mill of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res. 2009;44(2):157-162.

20. Jain R, Khattra SK. Exploring the use of rice husk ash in concrete: Benefits and applications. Asian J Curr Res. 2024;9(3):143-148.

21. Jamil M, Kaish ABMA, Raman SN, Zain MFM. Pozzolanic contribution of rice husk ash in cementitious system. Constr Build Mater. 2013; 47:588-593.

22. Roselló J, Soriano L, Santamarina MP, Akasaki JL, Monzó J, Payá J. Rice straw ash: A potential pozzolanic supplementary material for cementing systems. Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 103:39-50.

23. Karim MR, Zain MFM, Jamil M, Lai FC, Islam MN. Strength of mortar and concrete as influenced by rice husk ash: A review. World Appl Sci J. 2012;19(10):1501-1513.

24. Arif M, Egbu C, Haleem A, Kulonda D, Khalfan M. State of green construction in India: Drivers and challenges. J Eng Des Technol. 2009;7(2):223-234.

25. Olanrewaju A. Global perspectives on sustainable construction. In: Sustainable Construction Management: Research and Practice Companion. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2025. p.421-444.

26. Opoku DGJ, Ayarkwa J, Agyekum K. A conceptual framework of push factors for implementing environmentally sustainable construction practices. In: Proc ICIDA 2017 6th Int Conf Infrastructure Development in Africa; Kumasi, Ghana; 2017. p.12-14.

27. Sen B, Tam N, Maharjan R, Maharjan AK, Talukdar G. The shift towards green construction: A review of environmental management strategies and sustainable materials in developed countries. Trop Environ Biol Technol. 2024;2(2):80-92.

28. United Nations. The sustainable development goals [Internet]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals

29. Fitriani H, Ahmed A, Kolawole O, Hyndman F, Idris Y, Rosidawani R. Optimizing compressive strength properties of binary blended cement rice husk concrete for road pavement. Trends Sci. 2022;19(9):3972.

30. Modarres A, Hosseini Z. Mechanical properties of roller compacted concrete containing rice husk ash with original and recycled asphalt pavement material. Mater Des. 2014; 64:227-236.

31. Pandey A, Kumar B. Utilization of agricultural and industrial waste as replacement of cement in pavement quality concrete: A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(17):24504-24546.

32. Zhang MH, Lastra R, Malhotra VM. Rice-husk ash paste and concrete: Hydration and microstructure of the interfacial zone between aggregate and paste. Cement Concrete Res. 1996;26(6):963-977.

33. Habeeb GA, Mahmud HB. Study on properties of rice husk ash and its use as cement replacement material. Mater Res. 2010;13(2):185-190.

34. Vargas P, Restrepo-Baena O, Tobón JI. Microstructural analysis of interfacial transition zone and its impact on compressive strength of lightweight concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2017;137:381-389.

35. Isaia GC, Gastaldini ALG, Moraes R. Physical and pozzolanic action of mineral additions on the mechanical strength of high-performance concrete. Cement Concrete Compos. 2003;25(1):69-76.

36. Hu L, He Z, Zhang S. Sustainable use of rice husk ash in cement-based materials: Environmental evaluation and performance improvement. J Clean Prod. 2020; 264:121744.

37. Agboola SA, Yunusa U, Tukur M, Bappah H. Strength performance of concrete produced with rice husk ash as partial replacement of cement. Afr J Environ Sci Renew Energy. 2022;5(1):1–15.

38. Malhotra VM, Mehta PK. High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete. Ottawa: Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Development; 2002.

Published

2026-03-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Md. Zakir Hossain Khan, Md Mohaiminul Alam, Md Mahamudul Hasan Tayef, & Saif Muhammad Nasrun Nabi. (2026). Performance Evaluation of Rice Husk Ash as a Sustainable Supplementary Cementitious Material in Pavement Concrete. Academic International Journal of Engineering Science, 4(01), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.59675/E413

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.